RAM NIWAS SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/15254/2026 · 2026-09-28
Siddharth Nandan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15254 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
1. Heard Sri Ranjit Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to respondent No. 6 is dispensed with. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he had approached this Court by way of filing Writ-A No. 14086 of 2025 (Ram Niwas Sharma vs. State of U.P. and others) and this Court by order dated 18.09.2025 had directed the petitioner to file a representation before the Deputy Director of Education and he was required to take the decision on the said application expeditiously. In pursuance of the aforesaid direction of this Court, the petitioner had preferred a representation, which was disposed of by order dated 04.12.2025 with an observation that it is the District Inspector of Schools, who is competent to take decision on the claim raised by the petitioner. 4.
For reference, the operative portion of the impugned order dated 04.12.2025 is reproduced herein below:
"िनणर्य समीिक्षत िबन्दुओं के आलोक में उल्लेख करना समीचीन प्रतीत हो रहा है िक अशासकीय सहायता प्राप्त िवद्यालयों में कायर्रत िशक्षक एवं Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Niwas Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
िशक्षणेत्तर कमर्चािरयों के सेवािनवृित्तक प्रकरणों का िनस्तारण उप िशक्षा िनदेशक(मा०) की अिधकािरता में अवश्य िनिहत है िकन्तु राजकीय िवद्यालयों में कायर्रत चतुथर्श्रेणी कमर्चािरयों के सेवािनवृत्त देयों का िनराकरण कायर्रत संस्था एवं िजला िवद्यालय िनरीक्षक के स्तर से िकये जाने की व्यवस्था िवद्यमान है। श्री रामिनवास शमार् से०िन० की पिरचारक के रूप में की गयी सेवायें बािधत है तथा सेवापुिस्तका की अनुपलब्धता में इनके सेवािनवृित्तक देयों के िनयमानुसार िनस्तारण में किठनाई उत्पन्न होना दृिष्टगोचर हो रहा है। उक्तानुसार प्रकरण िजला िवद्यालय िनरीक्षक िचत्रकू ट को संदिभत करते हुए िनदेर्िशत िकया जाता है िक श्री रामिनवास शमार् सेवािनवृत्त पिरचारक राजकीय इण्टर कालेज मािनकपुर-िचत्रकू ट के सेवािनवृत्त देयों का प्राथिमकता के आधार पर दो सप्ताह के भीतर िनयमानुसार िनराकरण करना सुिनिश्चत करें। याची श्री रामिनवास शमार् सेवािनवृत्त पिरचारक को भी िनदेर्िशत िकया जाता है िक अपने सेवािनवृत्त देयों के िनराकरण हेतु आवश्यक प्रपत्र/अिभलेख तैयार कराते हुए िवभागीय अिधकािरयों के समक्ष प्रस्तुत कर प्रकरण के िनस्तारण में अपेिक्षत सहयोग प्रदान करें। उक्तानुसार एतद्द्वारा याची का प्रत्यावेदन िनस्तािरत िकया जाता है।"
5. Thereafter the aforesaid order was also subjected to challenge before this Court by way of Writ-A No. 4273 of 2026 (Ram Niwas Sharma and others Vs. State of U.P. and others). During the pendency of the aforesaid writ petition, some claim was released by the District Inspector of Schools and this Court by order dated 08.05.2026, while observing that the dispute of quantum of retirement dues cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction, accordingly petitioner was given liberty to approach the concerned respondent by order dated 08.05.2026. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date the application of the petitioner has not been decided; and since no time bound direction was issued, he is now being compelled to file the present petition. 7.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the respondent no.5 will take suitable decision on the claim of the petitioner, expeditiously. 8. In view of the aforesaid fact that the petitioner has already filed applications dated 01.07.2026 and 12.08.2026, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition WRIA No. 15254 of 2026 2
pending and on the consent of the parties the writ petition is being decided at the admissions stage itself with a direction to the respondent no.5 to consider and decide the aforesaid application of the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 2 months from the date of service of certified copy of this order. 9. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 29, 2026 S.Prakash WRIA No. 15254 of 2026 3 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad