Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11182 (JHR)

MAHIPAL ORAON v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3315/2026 · 2026-04-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:11668] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 3315 of 2026 Mahipal Oraon aged about 37 years son of Late Gandru Oraon, resident of village Boga P.O. and, police station- Bagru District-Lohardaga … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedy, Adv. For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.. PP 02 / 21.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Netarhat P. S. case no. 24 of 2021 (S.T. no. 69 of 2026) registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 and 397 IPC. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity and looted wallet of the informant with Rs. 10,000/- cash and beat the informant causing injury to him. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and without putting him on TIP, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 06.02.2026, as mentioned in para 20 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II, Latehar in connection with Netarhat P. S. case no. 24 of 2021 (S.T. no. 69 of 2026) with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 21.04.2026 Smita/-