IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8856 of 2026 Decided on: 03.06.2026 Dinesh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner: Mr. Jagmohan Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 2. The limited grievance of the petitioner is that the representation which was preferred by the petitioner, copy whereof is appended with this petition as Annexure P-12, has not been decided till date. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in case no decision has been taken upon the representation till date, the Authority shall take a call thereupon in accordance with rule within eight weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 3. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge June 0 3 , 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?