APHC010164642014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12024 OF 2014 Between: 1. SRI NAGARAJU NARASIMHA RAJU, WEST GODAVARI DIST, S/o Venkata Raju, Aged about 80 years, R/o K.Chikkala Village, Poduru Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. CHAIRMAN CUM MD APEPDCL VISAKHAPATNAM 3 OTHERS, Pradesh, Rep. by Chairman cum Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL, Eluru. 3. The Divisional Engineer, DPE, APEPDCL, Vizianagaram, 4. Assistant Divisional Engineer, Operation, APEPDCL, Palakol. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an Order, direction or a Writ or more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order Ir. No. ADE/OSD/PKL/Sub- Er/TE 12/12-13 D.No.2114/13, dated: 31.12.2013 issued by 4th Respondent as arbitrary illegal and violative of article 14 and 21 of the constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 1622 OF 2014 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated 21.04.2014 in WPMP No. 15109 of 2014 in WP No. 12024 of 2014 IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 15109 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance to the order of the 4th Respondent in ir. No. ADE/OSD/PKL/Sub-Er/TE 12/12-13 D.No.2114/13, dated: 31.12.2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: KOKA SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) Counsel for the Respondents:P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12024 OF 2014 ORDER:- None appeared for the petitioners. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submits that pending the Writ Petition, the petitioner paid the entire due amount as demanded by the respondent-corporation. Since, the petitioner paid the entire amount as demanded by the respondent-corporation, no cause survives for further adjudication in this matter and the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Date:21.09.2026 TPS/GNP 4 46 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 12024 OF 2014 Date:21.09.2026 TPS/GNP