[2026:RJ-JP:13373] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17027/2025 Dayal Ram S/o Shri Sadul Ram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Dhuvadiya, Peesangan, District Ajmer. (Presently confined at Central Jail, Ajmer). ---Accused-Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurpreet Sodhi through V.C. Mr. Chandra Shekhar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 30/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 33/2025 registered at Police Station Peesangan, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is the sole bread earner of his family, aged about 47 years. It is further submitted that the applicant has been behind bars since 13.02.2025. It is also submitted that charge- sheet in the instant matter has already been filed. It is next submitted that the statutory procedures as enshrined under the NDPS Act has not been duly followed during the recovery of the contraband. Moreover, it is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:13373] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17027/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that dodapsot of approximately 113.960 kgs is allegedly recovered from the possession of three persons including the applicant and the same is more than the prescribed commercial quantity of 50 kilograms, and therefore, it is submitted that strict rigours as enshrined under Section 37 of the NDPS would be applicable in the present case. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that the recovered quantity of dodapost i.e., 113.960 kilograms is higher than the prescribed commercial quantity of 50 kilograms, relying upon stringent statutory provisions as enshrined under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS stands dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/61