1 2026:CGHC:1851 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 279 of 2026 1 - Anandeshwar Mishra S/o Late Omkar Prasad Mishra Aged About 51 Years Address- Nagar Palika Parishad, Simga, Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. 2 - Smt. Geeta Dewangan W/o Late Jai Kumar Aged About 48 Years Address- Nagar Palika Parishad, Simga, Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. 3 - Paras Sahu S/o Late Hanumant Ram Sahu Aged About 51 Years Address- Nagar Palika Parishad, Simga, Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. 4 - Poshan Das Manikpuri S/o Late Amol Das Aged About 40 Years Address- Nagar Palika Parishad, Simga, Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. ... Petitioners Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Nagar Palika Parishad, Simga, Through Chief Municipal Officer, Distt. Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara C.G. 3 - The Joint Direcor, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. A. Sandhya Rao, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Deeksha Gauraha, Dy. Government Advocate 2 S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 13/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition by directing respondents regularized the services of the petitioners who have completed more than 10 years of continuous services in Nagar Panchayat Simga and Municipal Council, Simga within stipulated period, like judgment Annexure P/3 & P/4. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief as it may deems fit and appropriate. 10.3 Cost of the petition” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are working in Nagar Panchayat, Kashdol since 1998 & 2003. Petitioners No. 1 & 2 have completed about 27 years of service as daily wages employee and Petitioners No. 3 & 4 have completed about 22 years of service as daily wages employee. According to decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors., reported in (2024) 9 SCC 327 has conferred his right for regularization. He submits that identical issue is considered by this Court in case of Parmeshwar Sahu Vs. State of C.G. in WPS No. 2677 of 2023 decided on 12.11.2025, therefore, he may be permitted to submit detailed representation before respondents authorities and respondents authorities be directed to take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner within specified time. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking permission to submit representation 3 to be decided by the respective respondents, she is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for respective parties and looking to the nature of grievance raised and the fact that petitioner has not approached the authorities for redressal of his grievance as raised in this petition, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit detailed representation before respondents authorities raising all the grounds as raised in this petition and in the event, petitioner submits representation, the concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/-d/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.14 12:09:35 +0530