Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11167 (KAR)

K OBALESH v. COMMISSIONER

WP/5089/2026 · 2026-03-25

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17052 WP No. 5089 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 5089 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: K OBALESH S/O LATE KOLLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 941, 7TH CROSS, VIJAYA NAGAR SLUM, NANDINI LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 096 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.V. AMARANATHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BENGALURU – 560 020 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE A JOB TO THE PETITIONER ON COMPASSIONATE GROUND ON THE DEATH OF HIS FATHER WHILE IN THE SERVICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17052 WP No. 5089 of 2026 ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs: “a. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ on the same nature direction the respondent to provide a job to the petitioner on compassionate ground on the death of his father while in the service. b. Pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of equity and justice.” 2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would submit a fresh/new representation to the respondent - BDA, who may be directed to consider the same and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time frame. 3. The aforesaid submission is placed on record. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to submit a fresh/new representation to the respondent - BDA. If such a fresh/new representation is submitted by the petitioner to the respondent within a period of 6 weeks from today, the respondent shall - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17052 WP No. 5089 of 2026 consider the same and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate orders within a period of 2 months in the date of submission of the said representation in accordance with law. 5. Subject to the aforesaid directions and liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9