Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11160 (ALL)

NIGAM RAI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/15064/2026 · 2026-09-28

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15064 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. Mr. Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Jawahir Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some length of arguments, without pressing the matter on merits prayed for leave to withdraw the present petition, at this stage, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, as advised. 2. Mr. S.N. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and Mr. Anadi Krishna Narayana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the petition on merits, but have not objected the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner for granting leave to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Taking into consideration the submissions and prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and no objection made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 2, leave granted. 4. Without entering into merits of the case, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, at this stage. September 29, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jawahir Yadav, Sarvesh Yadav, Shakil Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Nigam Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad