Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11152 (JHR)

UFAN MANJHI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11007/2025 · 2026-01-06

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 11007 of 2025 ----- Ufan Manjhi, S/o Nagendra Majhi, R/o Village-Leda, P.O.-Sardaha, P.S.-Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro … …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kr. Jha, A.P.P. ----- Oral Order 02 / Dated : 06.01.2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner named above has been made accused in connection with Pindrajora P.S. Case No. 248 of 2024 (S.T. No. 25 of 2025) for the offence registered under Sections 103(1) and 238(a) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Bokaro. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by the Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.08.2025 passed in B.A. No. 1155 of 2025. The instant bail application has been renewed on the ground that more than one year has elapsed after framing of charge but the trial has not been concluded as yet. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that out of 11 witnesses, 10 have already been examined on behalf of the prosecution. Considering the stage of trial, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra Uploaded 07.01.2026