Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11149 (CHH)

VIKAS SINGH CHANDRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

CRA/2245/2025 · 2026-01-04

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:300-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 2245 of 2025 1 - Vikas Singh Chandra S/o Budheshwar Singh Chandra, Aged About 39 Years R/o Kosir Gautiyapara, Police Station-Kosir, District-Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) -----(Victim) ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through-Station House OfÏcer, Police Station-Kosir, District-Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - Keshav Kumar Chandra S/o Late Lakhan Lal Chandra, Aged About 61 Years R/o Village-Kosir (Gotiyapara), Police Station- Kosir, District-Sarangarh- Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Vinay Kumar Chandra S/o Keshav Kumar Chandra, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village-Kosir (Gotiyapra), Police Station-Kosir, District-Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Bhupendra Kumar @ Bholu Chandra S/o Keshav Kumar Chandra, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village-Kosir (Gotiyapara), Police Station-Kosir, District- Sarangarh-Bilaigarh, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Virendra Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma Judge Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2026.01.06 15:56:18 +0530 2 Judgment on Board Per Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge 05 .0 1 .202 6 1. Heard Mr. Virendra Verma, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Dy. G.A., appearing for the respondent/State. 2. This criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 413 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS’) seeking conviction of the accused persons for offences under Section 448, 323, 325, 302, 34 of IPC and enhance the sentence awarded to the accused persons. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant states that the present appeal be dismissed as withdrawn as the appellant has already preferred an Acquittal Appeal against the acquittal of the accused respondent and for enhancement of sentence also, being ACQA No. 393/2025 which is listed today along with criminal appeals filed by the appellants against the conviction. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection. 5. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti