[2026:RJ-JP:28893] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10506/2026 CNR: RJHC020620812026 | URN: CRLMB / 19483U / 2026 Lakhpat S/o Kedar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Girdharpura, P.S. Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). (The Accused Is Presently Confined Under District Jail Sawai Madhopur, Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 25.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.299/2024 registered at Police Station Chouth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 303(2), 340(2) & 61(2)(b) of BNS, Section 13 of RPGO Act and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that investigation is complete and accused- petitioner is not required for further investigation. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against [2026:RJ-JP:28893] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10506/2026] the accused-petitioner; that co-accused person has been enlarged on bail; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2026; that accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused person Munesh has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.02.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1044/2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Lakhpat S/o Kedar is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any [2026:RJ-JP:28893] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10506/2026] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and his address. In case, the accused- petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 64/HEENA