APHC010330302016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 25617 OF 2016 Between: 1. Cherukuri Mutually aided co-operative credit society Ltd,, H.0: Plot no 29, Phase I, Vanasthalipuram, Hyd-70 rep. by its President Mr. C Gopinath ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Principal Secretary, Energy Dept Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Rep by its Secretary, 11-4-660, 4th Floor, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad 500004. 3. Andhra Pradesh State Power Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep by its Managing Director, D.N0:19-13-65/A Srinivasapuram, Tirupati Andhra Pradesh 517503 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to the 2nd Respondent to amend the Regulation 1 of 2004 dt: 06.02.2004 exercising the Power conferred under Clause 15 of the same Regulation 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 31654 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the amendment of Regulation 1 of 2004 dt: 06.02.2004 on the file of 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: CH V PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:SRINIVASA RAO PUTLURI Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR ENERGY (AP) The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 25617 OF 2016 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket order that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 11.09.2026 and 18.09.2026 and the matter was posted to today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even, today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This indicates that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 2211..0099..22002266 TTPPSS 4 34 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 25617 OF 2016 2211..0099..22002266 TTPPSS