Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11135 (GAU)

MISS RUSHIKA PATHAK v. GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH, IPS AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/121/2026 · 2026-07-23

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010034722026 2026:GAU-AS:10263 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/121/2026 MISS RUSHIKA PATHAK D/O SRI INDRA PATHAK, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NO. 1 BORDIKORAI, P.O.- RANGACHAKUA, P.S.- JAMUGURIHAT, DIST- SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN- 784182. VERSUS GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH, IPS AND ANR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF (RECRUITMENT BRANCH), EAST BLOCK- 07, LEVEL-4, SECTOR-01, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066. 2:RAJESH KATOCH THE PRESIDING OFFICER PST/PET RECRUITMENT BOARD OF CONSTABLE/GD-2025 ASSAM RIFLE TRAINING CENTRE AND SCHOOL SUKHOVI DIMAPUR PIN- 797115 DIST- DIMAPUR NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R BORA, MR K KASHYAB Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 24.07.2026 Mr. R. Bora, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, prays that in view of the institution of a subsequent writ petition being WP(C).No.1061/2026, by the same petitioner, the present contempt petition be closed. Ms. B. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents does object to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, in view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant