Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11135 (ALL)

MAUSAM @ TUNDA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22784/2026 · 2026-09-28

Devendra Singh I, Rajiv Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22784 of 2026 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE DEVENDRA SINGH-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, Sri Himanshu Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the petitioner has already been arrested, as such, he does not intend to press this writ petition and seeks to withdraw it. 3. Learned AGA for the State has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 29, 2026 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Himanshu Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Devendra Singh-I,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Mausam @ Tunda .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad