CS(COMM) 678/2026 $~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 678/2026 and I.A. 16454-16461/2026 HEDSO HEALTH AND WELLNESS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. C.M. Lall and Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Senior Advocates with Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Mr. Kunal Vats, Mr. Sreejan Pankaj, Mr. B. Sidhi Pramodh Rayudu and Ms. Aastha Verma, Advocates. versus VCOS HEALTHCARE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar and Mr. Ashutosh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 03.07.2026 1. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from using, selling, offering for sale, advertising and/or directly or indirectly dealing in any products under the impugned word mark HOOP, logo mark , domain name <www.hoopveda.com> and impugned trade dress. 2. Mr. Sridharan Rajan Ramkumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Defendant, on instructions, submits that Defendant does not wish to contest the present suit and is willing to give up the use of the impugned trademark HOOP (word) and logo mark as also the impugned trade dress. It is further stated that Defendant shall take recourse to appropriate This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:28:02 CS(COMM) 678/2026 remedy under Section 58(c) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 within two weeks from today and seek cancellation of the impugned trademarks entered in the Register of Trade Marks and shall not prosecute its rectification petition filed against Plaintiff’s registered HOOP marks. It is also candidly submitted that in case of any existing stock of the impugned products, the same shall not be sold in the market and/or to the distributors and any listings of the impugned products bearing the impugned marks/trade dress, including any advertisements, offline and online, shall be taken down within three weeks from today. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the Plaintiff, on instructions, submits that Plaintiff does not press the relief sought in paragraph 86(f) to (h) of the plaint, in light of the undertaking given by the Defendant. 4. In light of the stands taken by the Defendant and the Plaintiff, which are taken on record and accepted and needless to state shall bind the parties, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant in terms of paragraph 86(b) and (d) of the plaint as also paragraph 86(e) to the extent of the undertaking given by the Defendant and as recorded above. 5. Defendant shall file an affidavit of undertaking within two weeks from today. 6. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7. Suit is disposed of with pending applications. JYOTI SINGH, J JULY 3, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:28:02