Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11131 (BOM)

SHRI SHAMRAO MAHADEO PATIL v. SHRI PANDURANG DNYANU LINGADE

FA/343/2002 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

905 - FA - 343 - 2002.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 343 OF 2002 Shamrao Mahadeo Patil … Appellant V/s. Pandurang Dnyanu Lingade & Ors. … Respondents None for the Appellant. CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 P.C.: 1. This Appeal is pending since the year 2002. 2. On 10th September 2026, the following order was passed: “1. This Appeal is of the year 2002. 2. Today, when this Appeal was called out, neither the Appellant, Respondents, nor the Advocates for the parties were present in Court either physically or through VC mode. 3. To afford an opportunity to the Appellant / Respondents / Advocates for the parties to appear and argue the case, list this Appeal on 24.09.2026, under the caption “For Disposal”, on the Supplementary Board.” 3. Today, when this matter was called out, the name of the Appellant and the name of the Advocate on record for the Appellant were called out by the Court Sheristedar. None appears either physically or through V.C. mode. 4. Perused the records placed before me. VRJ 1 VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed by VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2026.09.24 17:52:47 +0530 905 - FA - 343 - 2002.docx 5. By the present Appeal, the Appellant, that is, the original Opponent No. 1 in MACT Petition No. 126 of 1985, has assailed the judgment and award dated 8th October 1993 by which the MACT, Kolhapur, has partly allowed the claim petition by awarding compensation of Rs. 50,000/-. 6. In view of the absence of the Appellant / Advocate for the Appellant, as also the Respondent, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss this Appeal for non-prosecution. 7. First Appeal No. 343 of 2002 is dismissed for non-prosecution. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) VRJ 2