$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1172/2026 ROHIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Mr.Kumar Satyan and Ms.Suruchi Yadav, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for State with IO Charu Saini CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 06.07.2026 1. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the applicant under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking grant of regular bail in relation to FIR No.684/2022 dated 24.07.2022 qua offences punishable under Sections 376/354/384/506/509/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Section 67 of the IT Act registered at PS Aman Vihar. 2. The victim along with her parents is also present today in Court. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It appears that after investigation, the charge sheet has been filed and even the prosecutrix has This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2026 at 11:12:40 been examined, who has turned hostile. It is contended that the applicatin has been incarcerated since 15.08.2022 and has has already suffered more than four (4) years incarceration. 4. The instant bail application is strongly opposed by learned APP for the State. 5. Though, the victum in her examination in chief recorded on 13.07.2023 supported the case of the prosecution, however, in her further examination in chief recorded on 04.02.2026, she has resiled from all her earlier statements and had categorically stated that no such incident had occurred at the behest of the present applicant. She also deposed that the applicant has not circulated any obscene or nude photograph of hers. 6. Bearing in mind the testimony, which however, will have to be examined by the Trial Court, this Court, at this stage, finds that since the applicant has already remained incarceration for more than about four (4) years, therefore, the instant is a fit case of grant of bail. 7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is directed to be enlarged on bail subject to the conditions to be imposed by the learned Trial Court. 8. With the aforesaid, the instant application stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 6, 2026/ NC This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/07/2026 at 11:12:40