Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11128 (JHR)

ABHINAV KR. OJHA ALIAS ABHINAV OJHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11162/2025 · 2026-01-12

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:611 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- B.A. No. 11162 of 2025 ---- Abhinav Kr. Ojha @ Abhinav Ojha, aged about 24 years, son of Rajesh Kumar Ojha, resident of village Baikunth Nagar, Behind Padosan Hotel, Kathal More, Pundag, P.O. Pundag, P.S. Pundag, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand ….. Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand …... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Rishav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P. 02/12.01.2026 :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025, registered under section 108 of BNS, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-XXI, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner happens to be student and he has to appear in recent examination. He further submits that petitioner was in relationship with the deceased and he had decided to marry with the deceased however the parents of the deceased had not approved marriage along with this petitioner and the marriage of the deceased was fixed with another boy and engagement date was also fixed in view of that the deceased committed suicide. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.10.2025 and chargesheet has also been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and ( 2026:JHHC:611 ) 2 submits that allegation of tarnishing the image of the deceased by the petitioner is there. 5. Considering that petitioner happens to be a student and it has been pointed out that he has to appear in recent examination. Further in course of argument certain photographs have been produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner which is taken on record. In the F.I.R. it is stated that marriage of the deceased was fixed with another boy and engagement date was also fixed. The petitioner is in custody since 09.10.2025 and chargesheet has also been submitted. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on regular bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-XXI, Ranchi, in connection with Bariyatu P.S. Case No. 244 of 2025. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dt. 12.01.2026 Satyarthi/