Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010112852026
2026:GAU-AS:10212
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2959/2026 SMT JAYA MAHANTA WIFE OF SRI GAUTAM MAHANTA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 20, RAJGARH ROAD, BYE LANE NO. 1, CHANDMARI, SILPUKHURI, GUWAHATI-781003, DISTRICT KAMRUP METROPOLITAN, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006, ASSAM 2:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GANESH MANDIR DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 KAMRUP M ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GANESH MANDIR DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISPUR ZONE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISPUR
Page No.# 2/3 GUWAHATI781006 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
5:THE ASSOCIATE PLANNER PLANNING BRANCH GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
6:THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DISPUR ZONE GUWAHATI-781006 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
7:BLINK COMMERCE PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT GROUND FLOOR PIONEER SQUARE SECTOR 62 GOLF COURSE EXTENSION ROAD GURUGRAM-122098 HARYANA
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. KP Pathak
Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. S Bora Standing Counsel, GMC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 24.07.2026
Heard Mr. KP Pathak, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Page No.# 3/3 the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S Bora, the learned Standing Counsel, GMC.
2. Mr. S Bora, the learned Standing Counsel, GMC submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 04.06.2026, the petitioner’s premises has been de-sealed. He further submitted upon instructions that if any further action is required to be taken, the same would be taken by following the provisions of Section 404(3) of the Gauhati Municipal Corporation Act, 1969.
3. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant writ petition, for which, the writ petition stands closed.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant