1 2026:CGHC:14369 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1251 of 2022 * - Smt. Anuradha Patel W/o Dinesh Kumar Patel Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Limtari, Post Office, Purgaon, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Department Head Mahatma Gandhi Rashtriy Rojagar Guarantee Parishad Commissioner, Instructions, Indra Bhawan, H O D Building, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Bilaigarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 3 : None, though served Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner, in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing to the respondents to conclude Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.03.27 11:23:42 +0530 2 the selection process as per the advertisement dated 29.06.2017. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ directing to the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation. 10.4 Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case to the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Abhishek Singh, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/ respondents No. 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner has sought for direction to the respondent authorities to complete the recruitment process pursuant to Advertisement dated 29.06.2017. He would contend that the selection process has already been concluded. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Abhishek Singh, the writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive her prayer, if cause of action still survives. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti