APHC010381452017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 5389/2017 Between: 1. N. ATCHIYYA NAIDU, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.,A.P., OCCUPATION: ADVOCATE, R/O LACTHANNAPALEM VILLAGE, MAKAVARAPALEM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT-531113 ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P LAW GUNTUR DIST A P 2 OTRS, DEPARTMENT OF LAW, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT SESSIONS JUDGE VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for including the petitioner's name in the panel prepared for the post of Assistant Government Pleaders going to be appointed at Senior and Junior Civil Judges Court at Narsipatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 6536 OF 2017 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Repondents to consider the case of the petitioner for including the petitioner' name in the panel prepared for the post of Assistant Government Pleaders going to be appointed at Senior and Junior Civil Judges Court at Narsipatnam pending final disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D.GAYATHRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAW & LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS (AP) 2. G VIVEKANAND The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 5389 of 2017 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Ms. D.Gayatri, learned counsel representing Ms. A.Chaya Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this writ petition and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 17.09.2026 KA/JS 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 5389 of 2017 Date: 17.09.2026 KA/JS