- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15080 WP No. 1167 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 1167 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DARSHAN KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE K.N. KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.211, 3RD CROSS, 3RD MAIN, 1ST BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MITHUN G A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE REVENUE OFFICER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BTM LAYOUT ZONE, 2ND CROSS, 17TH 'A' MAIN ROAD, Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15080 WP No. 1167 of 2025 5TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034. 3. ASST. REVENUE OFFICER BBMP, KORAMANGALA SUB-DIVISION, NADAPRABHU KEMPEGOWDA BHAVAN, KORAMANGALA MAIN ROAD, AUDUGODI, BENGALURU-560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SPOORTHI V., HCGP., FOR R1; SRI.K.B. MONESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE REJECTION OF THE APPLICATION OF PETITIONER VIDE NO.BB1770000267172 DATED 21.06.2024 MADE BY RESPONDENT NO.2 BBMP ON 05.08.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A BY CLOSING THE APPLICATION ON 31.07.2024 VIDE STATUS REPORT NO.CHECKKGSC/FAP/SAP STATUS, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15080 WP No. 1167 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, due to change in law, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition and make a fresh representation to the authorities concerned. It is further submitted that, if the request of the petitioner is not considered, then he would challenge the same in the manner known to law and he has filed a memo dated 22.01.2026 to that effect. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to state that, if the respondents do not act upon the representation of the petitioner or acts contrary to law, he is always at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law. SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE CH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 88