[2026:RJ-JP:28358] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12696/2026 CNR: RJHC020474042026 | URN: CW / 27828U / 2026 1 Babulal S/o Kaluram, (Deceased) 1.1 Smt. Bhuri Devi, Aged About 69 Years, W/o Babulal 1.2 Mahaveer Prasad S/o Babulal, Aged About 41 Years, All Residents Of Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 1.3 Smt. Neelam D/o Babulal, W/o Kailash Meena, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Suriya, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk. 1.4 Smt. Mohini Devi D/o Babulal, W/o Ramesh Meena, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Nimmi, Tehsil Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur. 1.5 Smt. Radha Devi D/o Babulal, W/o Babulal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Thali, Tehsil Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur. 1.6 Smt. Sharda Devi D/o Babulal, W/o Rakesh Kumar Meena, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Thali, Tehsil Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur. 2 Madanlal S/o Kaluram, Aged About 69 Years, Resident Of, Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1 Nandlal, S/o Kaluram 2 Prabhunarayan S/o Kaluram, Residents Of Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 3 Laxmi D/o Manphuli, Resident Of Village Yaralipura, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 4 State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 5 Sub-Registrar First, Sanganer, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 6 Devaram S/o Gulla, (Deceased) 6.1 Kana, S/o Devaram 6.2 Sitaram, S/o Devaram 6.3 Muli Devi, W/o Devaram 6.4 Kamli Devi, D/o Devaram, W/o Lakshminarayan 6.5 Lada Devi D/o Devaram, W/o Bodu, Residents Of Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 7 Jagdish S/o Gulla, Resident Of Village Goner, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. 8 Gabru D/o Gulla, W/o Gyarsa, Resident Of Village Badavali, Via Peepla, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur [2026:RJ-JP:28358] (2 of 2) [CW-12696/2026] 9 Kalyani D/o Gulla, W/o Buccha, Resident Of Village Khojyawali, Chhitar Sarpanch Ki Dhani, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Chandra Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/07/2026 1. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners against order dated 23.02.2026, which is reproduced hereunder:- "i=koyh is'k gqbZA mHk; i{k mifLFkrA ftudh cgl vihy ds ,Mfe'ku ij lquh xbZA vihy esa lkjHkwr dkuwuh fcUnq fufgr gksus ls fopkjkFkZ xzg.k dh tkrh gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ryc gksA nLrh tkjh gksA QnZ nLrkost 'kkfey jgsA i=koyh vkbZUnk fnukad 06-04-2026 dks is'k gksA" 2. Bare perusal of the aforesaid order reflects that only interlocutory order has been passed by the Board of Revenue for admitting the appeal after hearing arguments of both the sides. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has utterly failed to show any prejudice, if at all, is being caused to the petitioners by aforesaid interlocutory order. 4. It is settled proposition of law that under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a writ petition cannot be filed against interlocutory order, which does not affect the rights of the parties. 5. In view of above, there is no scope of interference in the instant writ petition filed by the petitioners, and the same is hereby dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J 7/DIVYA