Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11117 (CHH)

SMT. NAMITALAHRI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3415/2026 · 2026-04-20

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:18013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3415 of 2026 Smt. Namitalahri W/o Basant Kumar Lahri Aged About 42 Years R/o- Village Belgaon, Post Beltara, Tehsil- Than Khamriha, District- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. (Address Correctly Written) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur, District-Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector, Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Saja, Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 5 - Vijay Singh Rajput, Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Beltara, Janpad Panchayat Saja, District-Bemetara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Basant Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Purvi Tiwari, P.L. HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 21.04.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs. “10.1. That, the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 2 / 2 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly set aside and quash the impugned order dated 09/04/2026 and 07/04/2026, in the interest of justice. 10.3. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to work in Gram Panchayat Deurgaon Saja, District Bemetara, in the interest of justice. 10.4. That any other relief which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is aggrieved with the order of transfer dated 09.04.2026. Challenge in this petition is to the order of transfer on the ground that husband of the petitioner is also working as Rozgar Sahayak and petitioner if is to join the transferred place she and her family will suffer adversely. Petitioner had already submitted representation before the respondent No.3 and 4 on 10.04.2026 and therefore, direction be issued to respondent No. 3 and 4 to consider and take decision on the representation at the earliest, within specified time frame. 3. Counsel for the State submits that the grievance of the petitioner is against respondent No. 3 and 4 for whom she is not appearing. 4. On due consideration of submission of counsel for the respective parties, the limited prayer made to consider and take decision on the representation, the writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No. 3 and 4 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner in an objective manner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the Order. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE