IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13890 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2025 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1. Guddu Yadav son of Late Inar Yadav @ Indar Yadav Resident Of Village- Semrhi P.S. -Yadopur District -Gopalganj 2. Chandan Kumar son of Ramakant Yadav Resident Of Village- Semrhi P.S -Yadopur District -Gopalganj 3. Lalan Yadav Son of Late Dinanath Yadav Resident Of Village- Semrhi P.S. -Yadopur District -Gopalganj 4. Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Kumar Son of Lalan Yadav Resident Of Village- Semrhi P.S. -Yadopur District -Gopalganj 5. Buni Yadav Son of Ramraj Yadav Resident Of Village- Semrhi P.S. -Yadopur District -Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Irshad Ahmad Khan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 02. In the present case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Yadopur P.S. Case No. 198 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352 of the BNS. 03. As per prosecution case, petitioners and other coaccused persons armed with lathi, danda, rod and spear surrounded the informant and in the background of their previous enmity, assaulted him. Coaccused Jagdish Yadav hit him on the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13890 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/3 head with farsa causing cut injury on his head and petitioners and other coaccused assaulted him with lathi, danda and rod. Further allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the father of the informant with lathi causing injuries to him. 04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The informant and petitioner sides are co-villagers and are neighbours. There is delay of three days in institution of the FIR and there is no explanation for the same. Specific allegation of assault on informant and his father is against coaccused Jagdish Yadav and Bhikham Yadav who is stated to have given farsa flow on the head of the father of the informant. But no such injury of any sharp/heavy cutting weapon has been found on the informant and his father. Other injuries on the informant and his father are simple and superficial in nature. The petitioners are having clean antecedent. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. 06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the doubtful nature of allegation against the petitioners and also considering the simple injury of informant and his father attributed to the petitioners and further considering their clean antecedent, let Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13890 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 3/3 the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court of learned ACJM-X, Gopalganj in connection with Yadopur P.S. Case No.198 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners. (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court. Anuradha/- (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U T