Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010143212026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1572/2026 MITHUN SAHA AND ANR SON OF ATINDRA SAHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SATBOINIR TUP, MOUZA - HOWLY, P.S. BARPETA ROAD, DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN - 781315. 2: ATINDRA SAHA SON OF RAJENDRA SAHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SATBOINIR TUP MOUZA - HOWLY P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST.- BARPETA ASSAM PIN -781315 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. MEHUL SHAH,MS A DAS,MS. S. CHANDA,MS. J GHOSH,MS. U NANDA,MS. K L R YANTHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. F A HASSAN(INFORMANT) Page No.# 2/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 27.07.2026 Heard Mr. S C Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. K K Das, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam as well as Mr. F A Hassan, learned counsel for the informant. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for pre-arrest bail for the petitioners, namely, Mithun Saha and Atindra Saha, in connection with Barpeta Road P.S Case No. 59/2026 under Sections 108/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. The case arises out of an FIR lodged by the brother of the deceased, Pinky Banik Saha, who was married to the petitioner No. 1, namely, Mithun Saha, for more than 9 years. It is stated in the FIR dated 01.06.2026, that his sister was married to the petitioner No. 1 and they have three daughters. Allegations of inflicting emotional and mental torture have been made. There is also an allegation that the petitioner No. 2/father-in-law of the deceased was also assaulting her. It is alleged that due to such emotional and mental torture, the informant’s sister committed suicide. Page No.# 3/3 4. Pursuant to an interim protection granted by this Court, the petitioners have appeared before the I.O and their statements have been recorded as revealed by the CD. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the informant submits that the matter has been amicably settled and the informant has no objection to the grant of pre- arrest bail to the petitioners, who are to look after the three minor children. 6. Having regard to the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. The interim order granting pre-arrest bail dated 16.07.2026 is hereby made absolute, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall not threaten, intimidate, or influence the informant or the informant’s family in any manner. 7. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant