1 2026:CGHC:14738 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1391 of 2026 1 - Shaoukilal S/o Bairagi Aged About 65 Years R/o Village- Pusalda, R.I. Circle Pusore, Tahsil Pusore Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Sunderlal S/o Bairagi Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Pusalda, R.I. Circle Pusore, Tahsil Pusore Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Ram Lal S/o Bairagi Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Pusalda, R.I. Circle Pusore, Tahsil Pusore Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Sachibai W/o Bairagi Aged About 70 Years R/o Village- Pusalda, R.I. Circle Pusore, Tahsil Pusore Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Gahlobai D/o Bairagi Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Pusalda, R.I. Circle Pusore, Tahsil Pusore Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Commerce And Industry Department Mantralaya Atal Nagar Raipur Distt- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chief General Manager District- Trade And Industries Centre Raigarh, Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Land Acquisition Officer Cum Sub Divisional Officer Raigarh Distt- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Bharat Lal Dembra, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyers (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 30.03.2026 BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.01 17:40:28 +0530 2 1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of pertaining to case of the petitioner from concerned authorities. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 to disburse the amount of compensation as per award dated 11.08.2015 after calculating the fair compensation with interest to the petitioners within stipulated time as this Hon'ble Court deems fit. OR in alternate it is most respectfully submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to submit fresh representation raising their grievance and the concerned authorities may be further directed to take decision within stipulated time. 10.3 Any other relief, which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be allowed. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application before concerned authority for redressal of their grievance with regard to disbursement of compensation, rehabilitation and employment. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection if the prayer of the petitioners is allowed. 4. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioners are permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as sought for. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini