Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11112 (CHH)

POSUDAS DESHLAHRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3652/2026 · 2026-04-27

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19560 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3652 of 2026 1 - Posudas Deshlahre Son Of Shri Purushottamdas Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Pendri, Block Berla District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 2 - Sushil Kumar Khutel Son Of Shri Khomalal Khutel Aged About 47 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Primary School Achholi, Block Berla District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer Block Berla District Bemetara Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 28/03/2026 1. Petitioners have filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to release the pending salary from September, 2025 immediately and also to grant suitable interest on above pending salary, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners are not pressing this writ petition on merits and is only seeking direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and take decision on representation submitted by petitioners for disbursement of their salary from September, 2025 till date. 3. Learned counsel for State submits that the main grievance of the petitioners are against respondent no. 2 for whom he is not appearing. 4. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties and also considering the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioners, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at admission stage without issuing any notice, directing respondent no. 2 to consider and take decision on claim of 3 petitioners/representation vide Annexure P-4 for disbursement of salary of petitioners from September, 2025 on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 5. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge alfiza