SAGAR SINGH ALIAS SAGAR PRATAP SINGHSAGAR PRATAP SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1378/2026 · 2026-03-10
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1111 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1111 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:6228] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.1378 of 2026
------ Sagar Singh @ Sagar Pratap Singh @ Sagar Partap Singh, aged about 29 years, son of Amar Pratap Singh, resident of 26785, Dimna Road, Dainik Jagran, P.O. & P.S. Olidih, Mango, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 10-03-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Bodam P.S. Case No.42 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126 (2), 115 (2), 109 (1), 352, 351 (2), 303 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to commit murder of Vijay Kumar and committed theft of mobile phone. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.12.2025 passed in A.B.A. No.6754 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim as well as their family members and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.10.2025 as has been mentioned in para-16 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Bodam P.S. Case No.42 of 2024 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim as well as their family members and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 10.03.2026-Animesh/