Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11109 (ALL)

KRISHNA MURARI PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15846/2026 · 2026-09-28

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15846 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 3 to grant the benefits of Promotional Pay scale on completion of 16/18 years continuous service to the Petitioner to extend for similar benefits of judgment and order dated 11.11.2021 passed by this Hon'ble Court (Lucknow Bench) in Special Appeal (D) No. 376/2021 and other connected appeals and order dated 24.09.2025 passed in Writ A No. 3853 of 2025 by Hon'ble Lucknow Bench of this Hon'ble Court within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 3 to decide the representation dated 30.04.2025/reminder dated 17.09.2026 moved by the Petitioner in the light of judgement and order dated 11.11.2021 and 24.09.2025 passed in special appeal (D) No. 376/2021 and Writ 'A' No. 385/2025 by Hon’ble Lucknow Bench of this Hon’ble Court respectively." 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents have contended that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Managing Director/Chairman (respondent no.3) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alpana Dwivedi, C.S.C. Krishna Murari Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) keeping this matter pending. Accordingly, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.3, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. 5. With the aforesaid direction, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. September 29, 2026 VR WRIA No. 15846 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad