Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11108 (BOM)

KARISHMA FARUK SHAIKH AND ORS v. VIJAY NANASO GHANWAT AND ORS.

IA/1401/2026 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

912-IA-1401-2026 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1401 OF 2026 Sairabanu Azad Shaikh & Ors. …...Applicants Versus Vijay Nanaso Ghanwat & Ors. …...Respondents —————— Mr. Rushab D. Phade for Applicants Mr. Vishwanath S. Talkute a/w. Mr. Mahesh Bhosale, Ms. Sampada Patil & Mr. Shivaji Kokare for Respondents. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 24th September 2026. PER COURT : 1. By the present Revision Application, the Applicants are seeking the following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (b) : “b) that after quashing and setting the impugned Judgement and Order dated 6th November, 2019 (Exhibit 'D' herein) passed by the learned Second Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Malshiras below Exhibit 406 in Regular Civil Suit No.38 of 1985, this Honourable Court be pleased to allow the application filed by the Petitioners below Exhibit 406 in Regular Civil Suit No.38 of 1985, in its entirety, and be further pleased to reject the plaint filed by osk 1 of 3 912-IA-1401-2026 (C).docx the Respondents in Regular Civil Suit No.38 of 1985.” 2. Heard Mr. Rushab D. Phade, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, learned Advocate for the Respondents. 3. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Rushab D. Phade, learned Advocate for the Applicants, sought a passover to take instructions from the Applicants. After some time, at his request, the Application was taken up on board. 4. Mr. Rushab D. Phade, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants, seeks leave to withdraw the present Revision Application, with liberty to raise all the issues raised in this Application before the Trial Court in Regular Civil Suit No. 38 of 1985. This request is not opposed by Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, learned Advocate for the Respondents. 5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Rushab D. Phade, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw the present Revision Application, with liberty to raise all the issues raised in this Application before the Trial Court during the trial of Regular Civil Suit No. 38 of 1985. osk 2 of 3 912-IA-1401-2026 (C).docx 6. The Civil Revision Application No.37 of 2020 is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 7. In view of the disposal of Civil Revision Application No. 37 of 2020, the Interim Application No. 1401 of 2026 is also disposed of. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of 3 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.24 17:51:48 +0530