Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11107 (CHH)

B SONU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/1837/2026 · 2026-04-26

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19390 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1837 of 2026 B Sonu S/o B Kotesh Aged About 30 Years R/o Village, Telgupara, Quarter No. 3/B, Street No. 60, Sector 6 Bhilai, P.S. Bhilai Nagar, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Details of Applicant Properly Not Mentioned In The Impugned Order Sheet) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, P.S. Supela, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Aman Tamrakar, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 27.04.2026 1. The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail, as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 1418/2025, registered at Police Station Supela, District Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 296, 115(2), 324(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. 2. As per the prosecution case, in brief, on 30.11.2025 at about 4:00 PM, the complainant, Simranjit Singh, along with his friend Amritpal Singh, ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Digitally signed by ABHISHEK SHRIVAS Date: 2026.04.28 11:04:11 +0530 2 while returning from Raipur, stopped at an idli cart situated in front of Ram Rasoi near Nehru Chowk. At that time, a few boys were arguing among themselves, and one of them, whose hand was in plaster and who was under the influence of alcohol, started quarrelling with the complainant. Thereafter, when Amritpal Singh was taking out the car to leave, the said person assaulted him with a stick, causing injury to his left hand. When the complainant intervened, an associate of the assailant abused him and attacked him with a knife with the intention to kill, resulting in injuries on his chest, stomach, back, and waist. It is further alleged that when Amritpal Singh attempted to record the incident on his mobile phone, the assailants snatched the phone, damaged the car by hitting it with a brick, and fled from the spot in a Swift car bearing registration No. CG-07-CC-9445. On the basis of the said incident, an FIR has been registered, and the present bail application has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicant is an innocent person who has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits there was a dispute between other persons, and the present applicant was merely trying to settle the dispute. However, a false recovery of a knife has been shown from the possession of the present applicant. He also submits that the present case is one of false implication, and due to political enmity, the applicant has been falsely implicated. The injuries sustained by the complainant are simple in nature. The charge sheet in the case has already been filed, and the trial is likely to take a long time for its final disposal. Due to poverty, the family members of the applicant are facing great hardship, therefore, the present applicant may kindly be released on bail. He further submits thatone co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court in MCRC No. 641/2026 on 19.01.2026. The case of the present applicant is similar 3 to that of the said co-accused, therefore, the applicant is seeking grant of bail on the ground of parity. 4. On the other hand learned State counsel opposes the bail application of the present applicant and submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent Court in the present case. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, and upon perusal of the MLC of the injured, it appears that the injuries sustained are simple in nature. Further, the charge-sheet has already been filed before the competent Court, and the applicant has been in custody since 01.12.2025. As the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case. 7. Let the applicant – B Sonu, involved in Crime No. 1418/2025, registered at Police Station Supela, District Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 296, 115(2), 324(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. 4 (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against his under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against his, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Abhishek