Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010005352026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/270/2026 NAYAN KUMAR SAHA AND 2 ORS LATE SOVA RANI SAHA ALIAS SHOVARANI SAHA, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 2, RANGAPARA NAGAR, RANGAPARA, P.S. RANGAPARA, DISTRICT SONITPUR, PIN-784505, ASSAM. 2: CHAYAN KUMAR SAHA LATE SOVA RANI SAHA ALIAS SHOVARANI SAHA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 2 RANGAPARA NAGAR RANGAPARA P.S. RANGAPARA DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN-784505 ASSAM 3: SARASWATI SAHA DAUGHTER OF LATE NAGENDRA NATH SAHA AND LATE SOVA RANI SAHA ALIAS SHOVARANI SAHA RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 2 RANGAPARA NAGAR RANGAPARA P.S. RANGAPARA DISTRICT SONITPUR PIN-784505 ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI, ASSAM-781011 2:THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR AND CAO PENSION N.F. RAILWAY Page No.# 2/3 MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM-781011. 3:THE ACCOUNTS OFFICER SENIOR DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER ALIPURDUAR JUNCTION N.F. RAILWAY P.O. ALIPURDUAR WEST BENGAL - 736132. 4:THE SENIOR MANAGER UCO BANK CENTRAL PENSION PROCESSING CENTRE 2209 SOMALWARBHAWAN 1ST FLOOR MOUNT ROAD SADAR NAGPUR-440 001 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER UCO BANK RANGAPARA BRANCH 0422 P.O. RANGAPARA DISTRICT SONITPUR ASSAM -78450 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. K L R YANTHAN, MS. J GHOSH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NF RLY, SC. UCO BANK BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 27.07.2026 Heard Mr. M. Shah learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. B. Chakrabarty, learned CGC, appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, and Mr. M. Sharma, learned Standing Counsel, UCO Bank, appearing for respondent Nos. 4 & 5. The present interlocutory application has been filed seeking substitution of the legal heirs of the sole petitioner, who expired on 24.08.2025 during the pendency of the connected writ proceedings, i.e., 2246/2025. Page No.# 3/3 It appears that the deceased petitioner is survived by the following legal heirs, i.e., 1. Nayan Kumar Saha (son), 2. Chayan Kumar Saha (son), 3. Saraswati Saha (Daughter). Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and having perused the materials available on record, it appears that pursuant to the death of the petitioner, the right to sue having been surviving, the aforesaid stated legal heirs is required to be substituted in place of the deceased petitioner. Accordingly the interlocutory application stands allowed. The applicants, namely, 1. Nayan Kumar Saha (son), 2. Chayan Kumar Saha (son), 3. Saraswati Saha (Daughter), are substituted in place of the deceased sole petitioner in the connected writ petition. Let an amended cause title be submitted before the Registry of this Court for doing the needful in this regard. JUDGE Comparing Assistant