Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 150
CWP-10683-2026 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026
MANINDER SHARMA
...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Ramandeep Singh, Advocate (through V.C.)
for the petitioner
Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to official respondents No.2 to 4 to take action on his complaint/representation dated 21.10.2024 and legal notice dated 23.02.2026.
2.
The petitioner filed a complaint dated 21.10.2024 before respondent No.3-District Education Officer, Hoshiarpur requesting to verify the authenticity of ETT certificate produced by private respondent No.5 during his appointment as elementary teacher. Petitioner claims that respondent No.5 submitted forged/fabricated ETT certificate. He was asked by respondent No.3 to submit an affidavit in support of his allegations. In compliance of aforesaid directions, he submitted the same along with other supporting documents. Despite necessary compliance no action has been taken till date.
DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.08 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-10683-2026
-2-
3.
Learned State counsel submits that matter is under
consideration and needful would be done in accordance with law.
4.
In the wake of statement of learned State Counsel, the petition stands disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits
5.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE April 08, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.08 16:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document