JITENDER KUMAR & ORS. v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
CRL.M.C./2497/2026 · 2026-07-04
Girish Kathpalia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11101 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11101 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL.M.C. 2497/2026
Page 1 of 2 pages $~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %
Date of Decision: 04.07.2026
+ CRL.M.C. 2497/2026
JITENDER KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Indu Ranjan, Advocate. Petitioners in person. versus
STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Ankit Sharma. Mr. Narendra Sharma, Advocate for R2 (through videoconferencing). Respondent No.2. in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T
2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.402/2022 of PS Fatehpur Beri for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2ee e60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.04 16:12:31 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:04.07.2026 16:24:25 Signature Not Verified
CRL.M.C. 2497/2026
Page 2 of 2 pages already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. 3. The respondent no.2 is present in court today and is identified by IO/SI Ankit Sharma. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. One daughter was born from wedlock of petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 and that daughter is in custody of respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and of FIR No. 402/2022 of PS Fatehpur Beri for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) JULY 04, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.07.04 16:12:51 +05'30' By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:04.07.2026 16:24:25