Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1110 (RAJ)

MAHIPAL BHATIYA S/O SHRI RAMESHWAR BHATIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1215/2020 · 2026-03-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13663] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1215/2020 Mahipal Bhatiya S/o Shri Rameshwar Bhatiya, Resident Of House No. 28, Balai Basti, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. 2. Rakesh Kumawat S/o Shri Suwa Lal Kumawat, Resident Of House N. 1C-138, Shastri Nagar, Gurjar Basti, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nav Ratan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the entire proceedings arising out of the Criminal Case No. 195/2018, pending against the petitioner before the Special Metropolitan Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases) No. 5, Jaipur Metropolitan under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. 2. Before proceeding further to decide the instant matter on its merits, this Court deems it just and proper to get the status of the trial pending against the petitioner before the Trial Court. The Trial Court has apprised this Court that the matter has already been decided vide judgment dated 01.08.2025 against which an appeal has already been preferred by the petitioner before the Appellate Court i.e., the Court of the Additional District & Sessions Judge No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan-I, Jaipur. [2026:RJ-JP:13663] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1215/2020] 3. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant criminal misc. petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as rendered as infructuous. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, shall also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J PUNEET KUMAR/71