Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 8071 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State, Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and perused the record.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent/respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent/respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved.
3. The basic relief sought by the petitioner in the present petition is to direct the respondent no.2-Sub Divisional Magistrate, Phoolpur, District Prayagraj to decide Appeal/Case No.18050 of 2025, Computerized Case No.T202502030218050 expeditiously.
4. It is argued by counsel for the petitioner that though a considerable time has already been lapsed but till date no final decision has been taken in the matter.
5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Mishra, Ramesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. Smt Gangotri Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 14 Others .....Respondent(s)
petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case strictly in accordance with law and without granting unnecessary adjournment unless there is no legal impediment. March 19, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 8071 of 2026 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad