CS(COMM) 224/2026 $~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 224/2026 GLAXO GROUP LIMITED AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Ruchika Yadav, Mr. Vardaan Anand and Ms. Hansika Bajaj, Advocates. versus MR. LOKESH CHHABRA AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Lokesh Chhabra, D-1 in person. Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj, Mr. N.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Bikash Ghorai and Mr. Salil Oberoi, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 02.07.2026 I.A. 15786/2026 1. This application is jointly filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 1 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of settlement between the said parties. 2. This suit was instituted by the Plaintiffs inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction against Defendants and all others acting on their behalf restraining them from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in products under the impugned marks AUGWINTIN, COBATEZ, FECTUM and/or packaging ‘ ’ and/or any other mark deceptively similar to Plaintiffs’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:27:44 CS(COMM) 224/2026 trademarks AUGMENTIN, COBADEX, CEFTUM and CCM, amounting to infringement. 3. During the pendency of the suit, parties have settled the disputes amicably and terms of settlement are incorporated in paragraph 2 of the application. Defendant No. 1 has acknowledged the proprietary rights of the Plaintiffs in the trademark AUGMENTIN as also the distinctive green and white packaging associated therewith including the colour scheme of the blister pack as also in respect of the trademark CCM and associated packaging and has agreed to forthwith cease manufacturing of the impugned products under the impugned marks and trade dresses and has undertaken to adopt a packaging, which is dissimilar to Plaintiffs’ packaging, amongst other settlement terms. Defendant No. 1 has also agreed to issue a communication to Defendants No. 3 and 4, its manufacturers within seven days from the date of order of this Court, apprising them of the settlement and instructing them to permanently cease any further manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations under the impugned blister pack SKYWINTIN 625 and packaging for CALKAL, CCM and destroy any templates or mock ups relating to the same and in light of the said communication being sent, Plaintiffs have agreed to forego the reliefs prayed against Defendants No. 3 and 4. 4. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of, recording the settlement between the parties. I.A. 16210/2026 5. This application is jointly filed on behalf of the Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 2 under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:27:44 CS(COMM) 224/2026 recording of settlement between parties. 6. Terms of settlement are incorporated in paragraph 2 of the application, wherein Defendant No. 2 has acknowledged the Plaintiffs’ rights in the trademarks CEFTUM and COBADEX and their distinctive proprietary packaging and agreed and undertaken not to use the impugned marks or any marks similar to Plaintiffs’ trademarks and/or similar packaging and to adopt and use dissimilar marks and trade dresses, amongst other terms. Defendant No. 2 has also agreed to issue a communication to Defendants No. 5 and 6, within seven days from the date of the order of this Court, apprising them of the settlement and instructing them to permanently cease any further manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations under the marks FECTUM and COBATEZ and destroy any templates or mock ups relating thereto. In light of Defendant No. 2 writing to the said Defendants, Plaintiffs have agreed to forego the reliefs claimed against Defendants No. 5 and 6. 7. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of, recording the settlement between the parties. CS(COMM) 224/2026 & I.As. 6163/2026, 6164/2026, 6165/2026, 6166/2026, 6167/2026, 6168/2026 8. In light of settlement between the Plaintiffs and Defendants No. 1 and 2, separately, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against Defendant No. 1 in terms of paragraph 51(a) and 51(b) of the plaint, taking on record the undertaking given by Defendant No. 1 that it shall comply with the obligations under the agreed terms and consequent undertaking of the Plaintiffs to comply with reciprocal obligations. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:27:44 CS(COMM) 224/2026 9. In light of settlement between the Plaintiffs and Defendant No. 2, the suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiffs and against Defendant No. 2 in terms of paragraph 51(a) and 51(b) of the plaint, taking on record the undertaking given by Defendant No. 2 that it shall comply with the obligations under the agreed terms and consequent undertaking of the Plaintiffs to comply with reciprocal obligations. Plaintiffs agree to forego reliefs claimed in paragraph 51(g), (h) and (i) of the plaint. 10. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 11. Suit stands disposed of along with pending applications. 12. Plaintiffs are held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870. 13. Date of 20.07.2026 is cancelled. JYOTI SINGH, J JULY 2, 2026/RW This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/07/2026 at 10:27:44