Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010149462026 2026:GAU-AS:10205 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/386/2026 M/S UTPALA TRADERS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI BIJU SINHA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, SON OF LATE BIREN SINHA, RESIDENT OF DHARAMNALA, P.S.- DIPHU, DISTRICT- KARBI ANGLONG, ASSAM, PIN- 782460 VERSUS KAILASH KARTHIK N AND 3 ORS. THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, JANATA BHAWAN, 2ND FLOOR, BLOCK-B, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN- 781006. 2:DILIP TERANG THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY-CUM-SECRETARY KARBI ANGLONG AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG ASSAM- 782460. 3:MORNING KEEY PHANGCHO THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DIPHU RURAL W/S DIVISION DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG- 782460. 4:BIKRAM TERON THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DIPHU RURAL W/S DIVISION DIPHU KARBI ANGLONG- 78246 Page No.# 2/3 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Baruah, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : None appears BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 24.07.2026 Mr. A.K. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that taking into account that the period of six weeks mentioned in the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023 is not over from the date of submission of the certified copy of the said order, which was submitted only on 04.07.2026, the petitioner would not like to press the instant contempt application. The learned counsel, however, submitted that in the circumstance, the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023 is not complied with, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach this Court again. 2. Taking into account the above, the instant contempt application stands dropped on withdrawal. 3. Before parting with the record, this Court, however, observes that in the circumstance, after a lapse of six weeks if the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 982/2023 Page No.# 3/3 remains uncomplied with, the petitioner would be at liberty to again approach this Court. JUDGE Comparing Assistant