Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11094 (CHH)

PAHAL SAMAJIK VIKAS, SHIKSHA EVAM SANSKRITIK SAMITI v. MAHENDRA PATHAK

CONT/1043/2022 · 2026-01-05

Smt Rajani Dubey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:644 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No.1026 of 2022 1 - Municipal Corporation Raipur Through Its Commissioner, White House House, Near Mahila Police Thana, Gandhi Udyan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Zone Commissioner Zone No. 09, Mowa Samudayik Bhawan, Near Mowa Thana, Vishansaba Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Vikrant Sharma aged about 42 years S/o Shri B.S. Sharma Secretary, Pahal Samajik Vikas Shiksha Evam Sanskritik Samiti, Raipur R/o A/705, Harsh Horizon, Daldal Seoni, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) CONT No.1043 of 2022 1 - Pahal Samajik Vikas, Shiksha Evam Sanskritik Samiti B-06, Second Floor, Shyam Square, Pandari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Mahendra Pathak Aged About 60 Years, Presently Posted As Zone Commissioner, Zone No. 9, Municipal Corpration, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vijay Sharma Presently Posted As Assistant Revenue Officer, Zone No. 9, Municipal Corporation, Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by R NIRALA 2 3 - Abhishek Agrawal, Presently Posted As Additional Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Anshul Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Sub Engineer, Zone No. 9, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Dr. Sumit Garg, Presently Working As Veterinary Doctor, Datrenga, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Bajaj, Adv for the petitioners in CONT No.1026/2022 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aniruddh Singh, Adv on behalf of Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Adv for petitioner in CONT No.1043/2022 and for respondents in CONT No.1026/2022 Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 06/01/2026 CONT No.1026/2022 1. Heard on IA No.1/2026, application for withdrawal of contempt petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute out of Court, as such nothing survives for adjudication. Therefore, the application may kindly be allowed. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the application (IA No.1/2026) is allowed. 4. Consequently, the contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3 CONT No.1043/2022 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner supports the statement made by petitioner’s counsel in CONT No.1026/2022 and submits that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute out of Court, therefore, the present contempt petition may also be dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is also dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Rajani Dubey Judge Nirala