Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11093 (AP)

GADI NARAYANA REDDY v. SRI V DEVENDRA REDDY

CC/2346/2026 · 2026-09-20

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010331412026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2346 OF 2026 Between: 1. GADI NARAYANA REDDY, S/o. Srinivasulu Reddy, Aged about 54 years, Rio. Manga Nellore Village and Post, Sullurpeta Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Petitioner AND 1. SRI V DEVENDRA REDDY, Revenue Divisional Officer, Sullurpeta, Tirupati District. 2. Smt P Saila Kumari, Mandal Revenue Officer, Sullurpet Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 07.04.2025 in W.P.No.8499 of 2025 and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondents: SUSHMA YAGANTI The Court made the following order: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2346 OF 2026 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 07.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8499 of 2025. 2. Heard Sri Umar Abdullah, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Umar Abdullah, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 07.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.8499 of 2025 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed and requested to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 21.09.2026 BSP 3 17 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2346 OF 2026 21.09.2026 BSP