Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11093 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/39312/2026 · 2026-09-28

Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39312 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Upon being informed about the fact that out of 0.4610 hectares, the sale deed of 0.3000 hectares had been declared void and that the petitioners if were wanting compensation of the remaining land, they would have to approach the Special Land Acquisition Officer, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed above. September 29, 2026 GS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Salim Khan, Ved Ratan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Vinod Kumar And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad