Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11089 (RAJ)

RAGINI DUBEY D/O ASHOK DUBEY v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/456/2026 · 2026-07-24

Inderjeet Singh, Sandeep Taneja

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:28612-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 456/2026 IN D.B. Criminal Appeal No.104/2026 CNR: RJHC020213912026 | URN: SOSA / 898U / 2026 Ragini Dubey D/o Ashok Dubey, Resident Of House No. 1421/38 Ambe Shri Colony, Vigyan Nagar, Adarsh Nagar, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Gupta. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Deputy Government Advocate. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 24/07/2026 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel for the applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicant was on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicant under Section 302 of IPC and she is in judicial custody at Central Jail, Ajmer. He further submits that the applicant is a lady, aged about 40 years and she has been falsely implicated in this matter. He further submits that the hearing of appeal may take long time and prayed [2026:RJ-JP:28612-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-456/2026] that sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended and she be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the applicant is a lady, aged about 40 years and she was on bail during trial and the hearing of appeal may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before this Court on 01.09.2026 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J 14/MG