Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11089 (CAL)

ABIJIT MODAK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WP.ST/263/2025 · 2026-01-06

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 06.01.2026 (Naba) 02 W.P.S.T. 263 of 2025 Dr. Abhijit Modak Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sankha Ghosh, Mr. Manujendra Narayan Roy, Mr. Gourav Haldar ...for the Petitioner Mr. Tapan Kr. Mukherjee, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the State 1. The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that a typographical error of inadvertence has crept into the order dated 17.12.2025, wherein the petitioner has been recorded to have made an application against vacancy under the 8OBC9 category instead of 8EWS9. 2. The learned A.G.P. does not raise any objection to such correction being effected in the order dated 17.12.2025. 3. We, therefore, direct that in the last line of paragraph no.2 of the order dated 17.12.2025, 8OBC9 be read as 8EWS9. 4. The order dated 17.12.2025 stands modified accordingly. 5. A 8No Objection Certificate9 (8NOC9 for short) dated 31.12.2025 bearing Memo No. ME/CC-70- 2025/M/3337 was issued by the Director of Medical Education, West Bengal enabling the 2 present petitioner to participate in the interview/selection process for the post of Assistant Professor in the Department of Paediatrics at AIIMS, Kalyani. 6. In view of issuance of the NOC, the parties are in agreement that nothing survives in the writ petition. 7. We request the learned A.G.P. to give a copy of the NOC to be kept in the present record. 8. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)