Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11080 (AP)

SINGEETHAM SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11971/2026 · 2026-09-16

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010231242026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11971/2026 Between: 1. SINGEETHAM SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. PRAVEEN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P AND T COLONY, OPP RTA OFFICE TIRUMALGIRI, SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE-500015. 2. SINGEETHAM PRAVEEN KUMAR,, S/O. VENKATESAM AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P AND T COLONY, OPP. RTA OFFICE, TIRUMALAGIRI, SECUNDERABAD TELANGANA STATE-500015. 3. SMT. SINGEETHAM INDUMATHI, @ SMT. SINGEETHAM INDU PRAVEEN W/O. SINGEETHAM PRAVEEN KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC RTD.ERNPLOYEE R/O. PLOT NO. 40, P AND T COLONY, OPP. RTA OFFICE, TIRUMALAGIRI, SECUNDERABAD TELANGANA STATE-500015. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522237. 2. THE A P WOMEN COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON OFFICE AT FLAT NO.506, 4TH FLOOR, MGM CAPITAL, DR.YSR AROGYA SRI COMPLEX, NH, CHINNAKAKANI, MANGALAGIRI, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, BUCKINGHAMPETA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH, 520002 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VENKATESWARA RAO STREET, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH, 520002. 5. SMT SINGEETHAM ANANTHA VENKATA KALYANI, W/O. SINGEETHAM SRINIVAS RAO, D/O. TELANAKULA ANANTHA VENKATA NARASIMHAM, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 9-75-15, BHIMANNAVARI STREET, NEHRU BOMMA CENTRE, KOTHAPETA, VIJAYAWADA(URBAN), VIJAYAWADA, NTR COMMISSIONERATE,PIN-520001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropiate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 in interferring into the at the behest and influence of the Respondent No.5 and family disputes Pressurizing the petitioners to settle the Family issues with the 5th Respondent by making use of their good offices and their Positions and further also interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners harrasing the petitioners at the behest and infulence of and also Respondent No.5 duly quashing and setting aside the impugned notice bearing File No.475/APWC/2025-26, dated. 13-04-2026 is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interferre into the Family disputes in between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interferre into the 3 Family disputes in between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE 2. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11971 OF 2026 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 17.09.2026 RMD 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.11971 of 2026 Date: 17.09.2026 RMD