MONESHWAR HEMBROM @ MONESHWAR HEMBRMAM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./1185/2026 · 2026-03-09
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1108 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1108 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:6100 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1185 of 2026
Moneshwar Hembrom @ Moneshwar Hembrmam, aged about 28 years, S/o- Karu Hembrom, R/o Village-Nawadih, Siryan, P.O. + P.S.- Karon, District- Deoghar
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opposite Party ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, Advocate
---
03/09.03.2026
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024 in connection with Karon P.S. Case No. 47 of 2024, S.T. Case No. 06 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 103, 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Madhupur.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier by a co-ordinate bench of this Court on 14.02.2025 passed in B.A. No. 1249 of 2025 and then on 01.08.2025 passed in B.A. No. 6704 of 2025. Learned counsel has submitted that a few witnesses have been examined who have not supported the prosecution case. However, the informant has not been examined so far.
4.
Learned counsel for the State has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner. However, he submits that the State shall promptly produce the witnesses so that the trial is taken to a logical end.
5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation against the petitioner and that the bail
2026:JHHC:6100 2
applications of the petitioner was rejected earlier, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. However, the State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses.
7.
Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this
order to the Director, Prosecution as well as Superintendent of Police of the concerned district.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 09.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-09.03.2026