2. 2. (DL) (DL) 14.01.2026 14.01.2026 Ct. No. 02 (ARPAN) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 22760 OF 2025 BIKRAM HALDER VS. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Mr. Jagannath Ganguly, Adv. (Via VC) Ms. Sutapa Mandal, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta, Adv. …for the U.O.I. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner appears on virtual mode and submits that inadvertently writ petition was filed though the issue involved in this writ petition relates to service under railways. 3. Union of India is represented by learned advocate. 4. In view of aforesaid submission, writ petition is found to be not maintainable before this Court at this stage and same stands dismissed. 5. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach Central Administrative Tribunal on the self-same cause of action. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)