[2026:RJ-JP:29227] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11164/2026 CNR: RJHC020666242026 | URN: CRLMB / 20646U / 2026 Gordhan Alias Bhoot S/o Battilal, R/o Bhawraki Sundari, Police Station Batoda, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined At Sub Jail, Gangapur City). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Swapnil Singh Patel Ms. Shivangi Singh Patel For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 28/07/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 03.07.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 02/2022 registered at Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 458, 380 and 395 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR; that no Test Identification Parade has been conducted; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that co-accused persons have already been [2026:RJ-JP:29227] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11164/2026] enlarged on bail and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions put forth by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record in the form of charge- sheet. Keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 19.04.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the name of the accused-petitioner is not in the FIR; that no Test Identification Parade has been conducted; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioner; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; that co- accused namely Prakash @ Mota @ Subhash @ Bablu @ Hardayal has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.07.2024 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9121/2024 and other co-accused persons namely Ramsingh @ Harkesh @ Kalya @ Bhoot, Jasrath @ Dashrath @ Udad @ Nanya, Rajesh @ Gotya @ Bhatya, Mukesh @ Bhurya @ Padda, Ramjilal @ Ramdayal and Ramkesh @ Titrya have also been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 12.10.2023, 09.02.2023 and 14.07.2022 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications No. 9278/2023, [2026:RJ-JP:29227] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11164/2026] 1444/2023, 10525/2022 and 10526/2022; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Gordhan Alias Bhoot S/o Battilal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail Authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 79/KAVISH