Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11079 (GAU)

BADAL ROY v. SHRI SANJOY PAUL AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2184/2026 · 2026-07-26

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010163642024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2184/2026 BADAL ROY SON OF LATE LALMOHAN ROY RESIDENT OF RANGIRKHAI PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS SHRI SANJOY PAUL AND ORS SON OF SRI SUNIL CHANDRA PAUL RESIDENT OF SRI GURU BHAVAN HOSPITAL ROAD PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSM 2:MUSST FUZLATUN NESHA CHOUDHURY WIFE OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 3:MD FAKAR UDDIN CHOUDHURY SON OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 4:MUSSTT SUPTA BEGUM CHOUDHURY DAUGHTER OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 5:MUSSTT ROSY BEGUM CHOUDHURY DAUGHTER OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 6:MUSSTT SUMITA BEGUM CHOUDHURY DAUGHTER OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 7:MUSSTT MAMPY BEGUM CHOUDHURY DAUGHTER OF ATABUR RAHMAN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF BHAKATPUR PARGONA BARAKPAR PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR SISHIR DUTTA Advocate for : MR. D CHAKRABARTY appearing for SHRI SANJOY PAUL AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 27.07.2026 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Chakrabarty, learned counsel for the opposite party No.1. 2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed under Rule 10(2) of Order 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for impleading the legal heir of Md. Atabur Rahman Choudhury. 3. Md. Atabur Rahman Choudhury died during the pendency of the appeal before the Appellate Court. However, his name has been erroneously mentioned in the cause title of the revision petition. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.1 has no objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the prayer of the applicant is allowed. 6. The legal heirs of the deceased, Md. Atabur Rahman Choudhury shall be impleaded in the present revision petition as respondents No.3 to 7. The cause title of Page No.# 3/3 the revision petition shall also be amended accordingly. 7. With the aforesaid direction, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant