[2026:RJ-JP:29431] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9952/2026 CNR: RJHC020591662026 | URN: CRLMB / 18450U / 2026 Buddhiprakash S/o Shanker Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Dhanoli, Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10516/2026 CNR: RJHC020597432026 | URN: CRLMB / 19510U / 2026 Dilkhush S/o Balaram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sonkachch, Police Station Khandar, Sawaimadhopur. (Accused Presently Confined At District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Pushpendra Sharma Mr. Trilok Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 29/07/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed against the orders of the learned trial Court dated 12.06.2026 & 04.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 93/2026 registered at Police Station Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) punishable [2026:RJ-JP:29431] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9952/2026] under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 111(2)(b) of BNS & Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that one criminal antecedent is registered against the accused-petitioner-Buddhiprakash S/o Shanker Lal under Section 13 RPGO, therefore, accused- petitioners may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner-Buddhiprakash is in custody since 09.06.2026 and accused-petitioner-Dilkhush is in custody since 29.05.2026; that no criminal antecedent is registered against the accused-petitioner-Dilkhush S/o Balaram and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:29431] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9952/2026] 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Buddhiprakash S/o Shanker Lal & Dilkhush S/o Balaram are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit their present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile numbers and their address. In case, the accused-petitioners change their address or mobile numbers, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the applications against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:29431] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9952/2026] 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 69-70/HEENA